r/MurderedByWords 13d ago

It always comes back to the cake

Post image
103k Upvotes

557

u/Rickrickrickrickrick 13d ago

My Trumpet coworker constantly says mask mandates are unconstitutional. I told him that businesses are allowed to appky a dress code and asked how are they unconstitutional. He said "mask mandates make it impossible for business to have a pursuit of happiness." Uhhh what?

232

u/palmtreesoul 13d ago

Throwing out buzzwords, their favorite trick to trigger those as intelligent as them… which is not intelligent at all

73

u/BrassMonkeyTFM 12d ago

It's a common brainwashing thing. And this isn't a left vs. right thing it happens on both sides. But when in a normal conversation people start saying buzzwords that don't make sense and seem out of context it means they spend way too much time in their (probably online) little bubble.

24

u/GaldrickHammerson 12d ago

In schools in the UK teachers like myself are trained to look out for students espousing buzzwords without seeming to know the meaning of them as it is a strong indicator for radicalisation. Its how we can tell a curious student trying to work out some fringe ideas from one who's caught in an abuse cycle.

4

u/Geppetto_Cheesecake 12d ago

Hey, when the blamestorming stops... so does the prairie dogging. We all know Jim over in accounting is having a tough time going through menoporsche right now and if he needs to use buzzwords that’s okay. We need to keep morale up in the adminisphere.

→ More replies

40

u/Shinikama 12d ago

Can you ask them where in the hiring contract or job offer they guarantee you get to be happy? If you have a handbook, even better. Because if they do, fuck, send me a link to their application page.

10

u/hullokoala 12d ago

If a job guarantees happiness they pay sudpiciously too much, jack shit or don't drug test.

→ More replies

31

u/Lemondisho 12d ago

That's hilarious.

They say something isn't constitutional because it doesn't adhere to the declaration of independence, a completely separate document.

5

u/ConsistentAsparagus 12d ago

Indeclarationofindependencetional is a mouthful.

→ More replies
→ More replies

1k

u/Artess 13d ago

Actually, the no fly list is maintained by the FBI and enforced by the TSA.

1k

u/Ancients 13d ago

I believe this isn't "The No Fly List" but a private block list among airlines for people who didn't follow mask guidelines and caused problems.

451

u/MonocleOwensKey 13d ago

yeah "No Fly List' makes it sound official. It's really more like a blacklist.

→ More replies
→ More replies

122

u/babartheterrible 13d ago

Does it matter though? Federal crime, federal time.

How stupid do you have to be to assail a government building and assume their won't be consequences? How is that "I didn't even do anything wrong?"

119

u/CombatMuffin 13d ago

Because they thought it was the Boston Tea Party: Washington Edition. They thought history was on their side.

Reality is a bitch.

9

u/[deleted] 12d ago edited 10d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies
→ More replies

5

u/Artess 13d ago

I'm just pointing out an inaccuracy.

→ More replies
→ More replies

6k

u/Cinemaslap1 13d ago

As soon as the "wedding cake" incident happened, I knew this would turn around and be used against them.... a lot of conservatives refuse to think with any kind of future.

1k

u/dumpsztrbaby 13d ago

what's the wedding cake incident? I tried googling but help me i'm dumb :(

4k

u/warriorofinternets 13d ago edited 13d ago

Some bakery in Colorado refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple because of their religious beliefs that homosexuality was wrong, and it made the news back when gay marriage was more of a wedge issue. Conservatives were crowing about how a private business can choose with whom they do business, free market, blah blah blah.

Now they are screaming they are being censored as private businesses choose with whom they do business and they are upset.

The irony would be hilarious if it all wasn’t so damn depressing.

Edit: oh my god I should have turned off reply notifications

1k

u/FourEyedTroll 13d ago

It's definitely still hilarious though.

662

u/Swayyyettts 13d ago

Yeah but they don’t see the hypocrisy, so it’s also sad

396

u/Cognitive_Spoon 13d ago

The wrong people are being censored! /s

300

u/SkeeterIsBlue 13d ago

Can’t have your cake and eat it too

82

u/oX_deLa 13d ago

In italy we would say they want a full keg and a drunk wife

13

u/Triairius 13d ago

Oh, that’s good.

6

u/IamyourFBIagent 13d ago

Clever saying, lol

→ More replies

77

u/PenguinMama92 13d ago

This just sliced through me 🤣

30

u/DameGinger 13d ago

…and that was the icing on the ca… oh i see what you did there!

11

u/Threadheads 13d ago

I think it was the cherry on top.

19

u/M1nd_Crime 13d ago

Many layers to this one.

12

u/StyreneAddict1965 13d ago

I think he's a little frosted by it, though.

→ More replies

27

u/MangoGh0st 13d ago

Idk seemed a little half-baked

→ More replies

96

u/AmNotSatan 13d ago

"Rules for thee and not for me"

→ More replies

81

u/tinkerbunny 13d ago

That’s their take exactly, unfortunately.

19

u/HR_Paperstacks_402 13d ago

Aka "cancel culture"

Their hypocriticalness is beyond ridiculous. It's ok for them to censor people they don't like but do it to them and they are suddenly whinny "victims".

18

u/No-Pie-6321 13d ago

They're not hurting the people they need to hurt! (Also /s but a paraphrase of a real person complaining about the prior administration)

→ More replies

228

u/feed_me_churros 13d ago edited 13d ago

I have a whole family full of right-wingers, it's not that they don't see hypocrisy, it's that they literally don't give a fuck about being hypocrites. Everything for them is some sort of ends to a mean means to an end (derp), if that means lying, cheating, etc in order to get there then so be it.

118

u/Rob_Drinkovich 13d ago edited 13d ago

Correct. They just want what they want and they’ll say or do anything to get it, there is no honor, there is no logic, there is nothing but them and their desires.

*spelling

50

u/sootoor 13d ago

So psychopaths?

167

u/Mediocratic_Oath 13d ago edited 13d ago

It's more of a belief in the supremacy of their way of life. Almost all of the conservative people I know are wholly convinced that everyone would be happy if they just agreed to live the "best" way.

It's a sort of deep insecurity about what it means to be happy. They tend to see people living happily in different situations as "wrong" or "sinful", and feel threatened by the societal pressure to leave them alone because doing so seems to them like being forced to admit that their way of life isn't the best.

For religious conservatives, this is often seen as tantamount to blasphemy, as admitting that others can find happiness in "sin" contradicts their dogma that there is only one "true" way of living happily. They tend to be extremely hierarchical in how they view the world, and so equality is a myth to them: there is only the "best" way of living and everything else is "worse". If they are forced to concede their place in the hierarchy, they fear that coexistence won't happen and someone else will take their place as the dominant way of life.

At this point things quickly devolve into projection, as they are utterly convinced that hierarchy is inevitable, and that any group occupying a position of power within that hierarchy will behave as badly as they do and will seek to vilify them just as they vilify vulnerable "outsiders" now. The possibility of actively abolishing the societal hierarchy or otherwise enshrining protections for minority groups is met with suspicion and derision.

Edit: I'd like to add that most of the time this isn't a conscious process. It's mostly just well-meaning individuals who are convinced that they have the key to helping others be "happier", coupled with a distrust of any authority that might disagree with them or challenge any of their assertions. On the whole they're fine with authority provided It's religious in nature or if it ties into their sense of identity or national mythology strongly enough. They're mostly just opposed to anyone suggesting that they may not be 100% right about the world or that any of their behavior needs to be modified.

58

u/MrVonic 13d ago

As a Canadian who cannot for the life of me understand why so many Americans behave this way, this was eloquently put that so much more of America makes sense now, thank you. This is their reasoning behind the intense cognitive dissonance they have, or at least most of them have a similar thought pattern

→ More replies

22

u/sootoor 13d ago

That was a great read. I appreciate it

→ More replies

21

u/Animegirl300 13d ago

So... Narcissists?

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

24

u/tinaboag 13d ago

You got it backwards it would be a means to an end

35

u/JesusSavesForHalf 13d ago

Their only ends is to be mean.

→ More replies
→ More replies

17

u/facetiae_uvidae 13d ago

They see it. Never believe them.

→ More replies
→ More replies

94

u/CarrionComfort 13d ago

The funny thing is that the ruling wasn't about having to bake a cake. It was about whether or not a government body treated the bakery fairly. That's it. The majority opinion skirts around the issue everything thinks it's about.

71

u/MrAnderson-expectyou 13d ago

Not exactly. The original case was about the cake, but when it made it to the Supreme Court, their decision to overturn the rulings below them was based on how fairly the bakery was treated.

→ More replies

10

u/cdnmoon 13d ago

Thank you for outlining that, I wasn't familiar with it either.

9

u/jazzhandpanda 13d ago

Always upvote "with whom"

13

u/ButWhatAboutBoomer 13d ago

Just to add, the issue was specifically whether the cake maker had to design a cake for the couple. The outcome essentially being, no, even applying the higher standard for equal protection for enumerated groups, the government can't force a person to create a unique work of art or labor. (Eg, you can't refuse to sell them a cake at all, but you can't be forced to design a special cake for them).

114

u/New_Account_For_Use 13d ago

That's not exactly the case. Some major details were left out here.

The case was over a custom wedding cake. The shop owner considered this art and was being "forced" to create art they did not believe in since they were a conservative christian and did not believe in same sex marriage.

The shop owner offered to sell the couple an off the shelf cake or any other bakedgoods from the store. The shop owner would not create for them this specific cake for them.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masterpiece_Cakeshop_v._Colorado_Civil_Rights_Commission

131

u/Brainwol 13d ago

That’s not entirely accurate either. Quoting directly from the majority opinion, the couple “visited the shop and told Phillips that they were interested in ordering a cake for ‘our wedding’. They did not mention the design of the cake they envisioned. Phillips informed the couple that he does not ‘create’ wedding cakes for same-sex weddings. He explained, ‘I’ll make your birthday cakes, shower cakes, sell you cookies and brownies, I just don’t make cakes for same sex weddings.” 138 S. Ct. 1719, 1724 (2018)

From that, it appears there was no offer to sell the couple an “off the shelf cake.” The baker (“Phillips”) denied selling the couple any wedding cake, before any discussion of the design of the cake.

27

u/shoebee2 13d ago

And this is the exact correct legal footing. One reason why we have so hard a time communicating is that all the other answers while wrong hold as much weight as the actual answer. There is so much noise we can’t hear a damn thing.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

240

u/Zoe_the_redditor 13d ago

A Coloradan cake baker won a case in the supreme court affirming that his business was allowed to not bake a wedding cake for a same sex couple on the basis of them being a same sex couple. Now when a conservative cries censorship by a private cooperation many like to remind them that this is the type of ruling they supported, only they don’t like it now because they are the ones being denied service instead of LGBT+ people

111

u/katelledee 13d ago

I’d argue that that’s not exactly what the decision was in the Supreme Court case. You’re absolutely correct that the bakery won that case, but they won because the Colorado Civil Rights Commission didn’t use religious neutrality, so they reversed the discrimination judgement against the bakery. They did not, however, rule on the broader issue of the intersection of anti-discrimination laws and free speech/freedom to exercise religion.

8

u/-888- 13d ago

the Colorado Civil Rights Commission didn’t use religious neutrality,

I don't understand what this means. didn’t use? What is this commission to this case?

27

u/katelledee 13d ago

The Commission was who originally ruled that the bakery was guilty of discrimination. As far as religious neutrality goes, that’s First Amendment related. The Supreme Court ruled that while a business owner could have their right to free exercise of religion limited by generally applicable laws (like, if your religion says black people are terrible, too bad, you still have to serve them in your business because there are laws against racial discrimination), the State has to remain neutral toward all religions. And the Court felt the Commission displayed hostility toward the religious views of the bakery owner, because the Commission compared their religious beliefs to defense of slavery or the Holocaust.

→ More replies
→ More replies

48

u/slightlyassholic 13d ago

Here you go!

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44361162

Basically it's the latest incarnation of "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" where "anyone" means whatever group they want to discriminate against.

As a result this "wedding cake" gets brought up when a certain group of traditionally bigoted people get butthurt over getting turned away.

→ More replies

12

u/Cinemaslap1 13d ago

It seems people have gotten back before I could. but it really showed the shortsightedness of conservatives.

→ More replies
→ More replies

67

u/Soddington 13d ago

Yeah it's like when Muslims and Jews and even the piss taking Satanists suddenly used their 'freedom of religion' laws that the stupider states enacted against them.

"No we did not mean THOSE religions!!!"

→ More replies

1k

u/ladygrayfox 13d ago

Edit that: a lot of conservatives refuse to think.

597

u/Cinemaslap1 13d ago

You know, I love to bash conservatives whenever I can.... But I have to give them props at least here, they do think.

They think about the underage girls that they can exploit.

They think about their wallets getting bigger even though our country needs better infrastructure, better education, better healthcare... but they only think about their wallets.

They also think about the next group of people they can oppress.

279

u/conancat 13d ago

They also can't stop thinking about how persecuted they are when they "haven't even done anything wrong".

r/persecutionfetish

75

u/Blockofett 13d ago

Man Christian's also have this, and I think it might even be the root cause

"People are getting they're head cut off for speaking the word of God!" Actual qoute from back when I was forced to go to Sunday School

I mean if you wanna try to force your God on people who tell you they'll cut your head off for it point blank, then I don't know what to tell you Mr. Largest Religion on Earth

30

u/DuntadaMan 13d ago

Having been raised in one of the most doomsday cult branches of Christianity I can tell you that being persecuted is central to the identity of American Christians.

They are told the world is evil and only a few people are fighting back. They are taught constantly that they are at war with evil and that evil is winning.

If you are not being persecuted then you are obviously part of that overwhelming evil.

17

u/MyJourneyToTartarus 13d ago

Thank you for explaining this, cause as a non-Christian European I am highly fascinated by American christians. Saying they are dumb is too easy, not all of these people are dumb. Yet they still keep doing these actions that make no sense in sane eyes. I often wondered why. Your explanation makes sense. This is also why I dislike a lot of American movies: it is always the american hero saving the world while everyone around them is either too stupid or one of the bad guys. Many Americans love this whole idea and I can see how a church can abuse this thought and brainwash people.

11

u/TheHistoryofCats 13d ago

The traditional Mainline Protestant churches in the US, which are mostly descended from European denominations, are a lot saner and still exist in most American towns. The problem is that right now they're massively outnumbered by very loud, very political fundamentalist crazies, many of whom are "non-denominational" (ie, random independent churches started up by people who may or may not have any actual qualifications or theological education). So it's not all American Christians that are like this... But it sure is a lot of them.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

44

u/Admirable_Sun_8774 13d ago

r/persecutionfetish

Wait, is that "Kink-shaming is my kink!" skit actually a thing?

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

12

u/Bon_of_a_Sitch 13d ago

That is why I was secretly happy about the results of that case. While the individual outcomes were not desirable, the implications for the future made it almost worthwhile.

→ More replies

12

u/Easy-Bake-Oven 13d ago

They just don't care because they get away with not thinking about the future. Example Obama can't pick a Supreme Court Justice his last year but they will force one through in the last few months of Trump.

→ More replies

155

u/Mikarim 13d ago

People keep bringing up the wedding cake case as an example of private companies excluding anyone they want from their business. In reality, that case has a far more narrow holding. The court only held that the governments treatment of the cake shop in commission hearings was improper because the commissioners acted biased towards the cake shop owners religion. If the commission had been neutral and done their job, the court held that the government might be able to enforce sexual orientation protections on private businesses. Never assume anything on reddit is true though and actually read the case for yourself instead of parroting what everyone else says

Source: law student with 1 week left who has taken a course called sexuality and the law which focuses on this topic heavily

→ More replies

8

u/Admirable_Sun_8774 13d ago

Out of the loop? What the hell could be so bad about a cake that he got banned from multiple companies?

Did he get cheesecake? That shit is the devil's work.

(But seriously, what is it?)

→ More replies

22

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[deleted]

17

u/Team_Braniel 13d ago

Who would have thought the party of "Government doesn't work" doesn't know how to govern.

→ More replies
→ More replies

9k

u/SuggestAPhotoProject 13d ago

“Ever since I tried to overthrow the government, people treat me different.”

4k

u/Paddy_Tanninger 13d ago

It's better than that...

"Ever since I tried to overthrow the government in the interests of a party that claims to favor free market enterprise, the free market enterprises are treating me different"

1k

u/DownloadPizza 13d ago

Freedom for me, but not for thee

804

u/Stompedyourhousewith 13d ago

republican simp: "wait! but im one of you!"
the one percent: "lol, thats adorable"

376

u/SpaceChook 13d ago

It’s amazing they don’t get this.

357

u/mheat 13d ago

Some of them are starting to come full circle and are calling for politicians to stop taking money from corporations. It’s like they are trying to own the liberals by pushing a change that liberals have been pushing for this whole time.

115

u/hereforthefeast 13d ago

Never believe that Republicans are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The Republicans have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is passed.

  • paraphrased from Satre

26

u/purpleowl385 13d ago

They literally spend ridiculous amounts of money on figuring out how to phrase things to scare people.

I can't recall which, but there was an article recently about them struggling to spin something in a way that made their voters hate it. It just made too much sense any way they looked at it...

→ More replies

11

u/UncleInternet 13d ago

This is such an oft-relevant quote (the original, and as you've adapted it). I try to convey the nut of it to people all the time in conversations like these: the GOP's messaging ghouls aren't stupid - they just aren't responding to an incentive structure that penalizes the appearance of stupidity so long as the message itself has the right in-group coding.

It's completely asymmetric, and the more we engage with them on their terms - even in pointing out seemingly obvious idiocy - the more we accede to their game and the less anything seems to matter to anyone else.

→ More replies
→ More replies

84

u/HipGuide 13d ago

We've been here for years.

54

u/-mooncake- 13d ago

Since Citizens United.

→ More replies

89

u/ModsRDingleberries 13d ago

To be fair, Republican voters are overwhelmingly in favor of limiting corporate money...they just lack the basic understanding of cause and effect that voting for republicans does not achieve this goal at all.

26

u/aattanasio2014 13d ago

I remember reading the book Democracy Despite Itself in high school and there was one chapter where they went and interviewed people on the street or something and they would go and ask people questions like “Are you in favor of or against the legalization of abortions?” And the people would be like “Oh I’m against abortions. I’m a republican.” And they’d be like “Cool, then you must be voting for Obama, right? Since hes the republican candidate?” And they’d be like “Yeah, totally. I love how much Obama hates abortions.”

The authors’ claim after doing this was basically “most people have no concept of political issues or political parties; they just blindly align themselves to a team and don’t bother to actually educate themselves on anything.”

13

u/ModsRDingleberries 13d ago

Most people can't think for themselves. Obviously, the fact that we don't teach critical thinking in school (it would be bad for the ruling class if we did) exacerbates the deficit of people capable of thinking for themselves, but even if we did I am confident that there would be at least 25% of the population still incapable of forming their own thoughts. Religion also doesn't help as all the inexplicable contradiction and falsehoods greatly discourage critical thinking and it bleeds to the other facets of their life, all of which are "less important" than their religion and thus must be held to the same or lower standards, not higher ones, lest their religion loses its importance.

→ More replies
→ More replies

34

u/sp4cej4mm 13d ago

Yea of course they are. They aren’t in power anymore 😂

Just like how the deficit is magically an issue all of the sudden

9

u/ReignInSpuds 13d ago

And they've all suddenly heard of racism and xenophobia since the travel ban to and from India. The far right stays alive thanks exclusively to double-standards.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

10

u/Western_Resort 13d ago

They don’t realize most of us really want the same things. It’s just how you word it. But it’s easier to be shit weasels and attack democracy if the people are fighting on your behest.

50

u/OldManHipsAt30 13d ago

They always need to be the victim, it’s part of the modern conservative identity.

That’s why the current narrative is built around the idea that academia, media, intelligence agencies, and Democrats are all conspiring with corporations against honest rural Patriots.

10

u/Eccohawk 13d ago

Not only are they always the victims, everyone else is a lazy welfare criminal immigrant that deserves to get shot by the cops because they haven't pulled on those bootstraps hard enough.

5

u/OllinVulca 13d ago

Ah yes but we liberals are the fragile snowflakes....

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

8

u/HasturDragon 13d ago

This right here.

The true power of conservatives, republicans, and the one percent that back them is to get people to vote against their own self interests on 'us or them' platforms where the people voting vote in favor of us 'us' but when they themselves fall into the category of 'them' whether they believe it or not.

7

u/bt812 13d ago

I identify as a millionaire business owner too! I'm just temporarily poor, promise!

→ More replies
→ More replies

89

u/UhPhrasing 13d ago

It's frustrating that I usually immediately go to "this dude is just stupid as fuck", when in reality he likely knows exactly what he's doing / saying and it's just his stupid-as-fuck followers that think it unironically.

21

u/blinkingsandbeepings 13d ago

“You can’t wake someone who’s pretending to be asleep.”

58

u/daemonelectricity 13d ago

when in reality he likely knows exactly what he's doing

They totally do. When a troll is wrong, they lean into it. They don't back down. Their pride is tied up in being allowed to be a cunt on a technicality.

22

u/CornjobWillBeBlamed 13d ago

I dont know, man. Fuentes is real dumb.

8

u/daemonelectricity 13d ago

I think even the dumb ones play dumber.

6

u/SarcasticGiraffes 13d ago

I'd argue that is not just "allowed to be," but more like "be one, and then evade consequences on a technicality."

Reason being - "allowed" implies they ask for permission...

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

422

u/not-a-dream 13d ago

It couldn't possibly be the consequences of my own actions!

171

u/LargeSackOfNuts 13d ago

No, its those companies who are in the wrong!!!

323

u/GoldenBrownApples 13d ago

"Companies are supposed to do whatever they want, as long as it hurts those other people, otherwise they need to shut up and let me do whatever I want. Don't they see how white I am?"

89

u/ComradeTrump666 13d ago

The Office of Technology Assessment OTA was dismantled in 1995, following the 1994 mid-term elections which led to Republican control of the Senate and the House. Republican legislators characterized the OTA as wasteful and hostile to GOP interests.

They did it to themselves. Now they complain about big Corp Censorship and "cancel culture". Why? Coz they have the monopoly and they can do whatever they want.

→ More replies

37

u/texanarob 13d ago

The customer is always right, as long as I'm the customer.

→ More replies
→ More replies

23

u/the_Dorkness 13d ago

Consequences?! But... I’m white!

→ More replies

200

u/c3p-bro 13d ago

This is the reality - the cake shop would have always been able to kick you out for shitting on the floor. The court case was about discrimination. Businesses have ALWAYS had freedom to refuse service for any reason that doesn’t involve a protected class.

This is what freedom of associaton looks like, but republicans only what freedom for themselves and everyone else to fall in line

87

u/Zoklett 13d ago

Also you have to be next level stupid to admit you're discriminating when you have the total right to kick them out for no reason at all. Like, putting your own business at risk to make a point of being a bigot is next level bigotry.

36

u/FireBeyond 13d ago

You'd be absolutely right. Wedding photographers are an area where you'll get the occasional "virtue" (hah) signalling of "I am a Christian and only photograph Christian marriages".

I think there was even an idiot in Tennessee who was suing the state for violating her religious beliefs so she didn't have to shoot a gay wedding. Except, uh, no-one had ever asked her to. And no-one who looked at her website ever would. And her photos sucked. Couldn't resist the last one.

7

u/lucassoren 13d ago

What kind of moron business person wants FEWER customers?

5

u/skinnytallsmall 13d ago

Um...when you can charge those fewer customers a lot more money... my girlfriend is a photographer and was asking for $300 to take wedding pics. I helped book events for her and she got real busy doing 4 or 5 shoots a week so I just started asking for $1000 and "unfortunately" it's usually white assholes who can afford it. But still, it's twice as much money for half as much work.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

65

u/M_Mich 13d ago

the advantage for non bigots is that bigots tend to be self assured in their position. if the bakery had thought to use the old bigot method of “i’m sorry we’re booked for that day” instead of “we don’t serve your kind” they’d have likely gotten away with it just like all the other bigots that use that method since the beginning of society but most bigots want you to know their opinions on things so they voluntarily identify themselves as bigots. because they think they’re the majority and that all good people will rally to their cause

11

u/Nousernamesleft0001 13d ago

That’s a great point. I hadn’t thought of that.

28

u/M_Mich 13d ago

that’s the more 50’s style. “we don’t have any vacancies, we just always keep the sign on”

“we don’t have any apartments available right now”

“those tables aren’t available now as we are short staffed”.

“that’s just outside our delivery area”

“that house isn’t on the market, we just haven’t updated the listing”

new school bigotry is “that’s not available because my religion says you’re bad and i don’t have to serve you. my freedoms say i don’t! i’m a patriot and standing up for my beliefs, help me tucker carlson!”

→ More replies

13

u/MrDude_1 13d ago

From the beginning I was telling my wife that they were fucking morons for not just saying something along the lines of "it's not because you're gay, it's because you're being an asshole" That would have been totally accurate... And ended the whole damn thing before it started.

But what the dude above said is absolutely correct. In that case those idiots were so bigoted that they couldn't think logically. Didn't even know they were being ignorant.

A more common example is when you see a dude tell a lady that she should smile more. They see it as a perfectly innocent comment. Go ask the lady her opinion on it.

→ More replies

9

u/dontbajerk 13d ago edited 13d ago

Reminds me, there was a really interesting news piece here in St. Louis a fair few years back (late 90s maybe) that had two best friends who grew up as next door neighbors. They had similar names, both wore glasses and were kind of nerdy, similar builds, sounded similar even (grew up middle class suburbs), they even went to similar colleges and pursued similar careers. One was black and one was white. They had them do similar things on the same day at various businesses in person. Trying to get an apartment, those sorts of things.

The black guy never had any overt racism, no real rudeness, just a lot more closed doors. Was pretty eye opening how obvious it was despite not being obvious if you only saw it happen without the greater context, ya know? The people doing it were definitely trending a bit older, so probably coming of age in the 50s-60s. I gather it's gotten better here the past 20 years, but still present.

→ More replies
→ More replies

14

u/JustABigDumbAnimal 13d ago

Kinda hard to make excuses when you were totally fine with the customer right up until they mentioned the names on the cake, or asked for two groom figurines.

→ More replies

32

u/Crassus-sFireBrigade 13d ago

The number of times that I have had to explain that being a Nazi doesn't provide you protection under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.....

→ More replies

12

u/Tlrasmus1 13d ago

The dying vestiges of white supremacy. It will be nice when this is over with. Unfortunately, that will be a while.

→ More replies

23

u/[deleted] 13d ago edited 8d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies

16

u/bcuap10 13d ago

Being a Patriot is the only protected class that should matter in their eyes.

24

u/DextrosKnight 13d ago

But Tom Brady plays for the Bucs now

→ More replies

23

u/JustABigDumbAnimal 13d ago

To paraphrase Demetri Martin: anytime someone describes themselves as a "Patriot", it means they're about to be an asshole.

11

u/dangolo 13d ago

To paraphrase Demetri Martin: anytime someone describes themselves as a "Patriot", it means they're about to be an asshole.

Same applies to statements beginning with "I'm not racist but..."

8

u/JustABigDumbAnimal 13d ago

"I'm not racist, but " is just another way of saying "Here's how I'm racist"

5

u/tilobot 13d ago

and/or advocate for something that violates the ideals of the nation they claim to be so patriotic about

→ More replies

10

u/snootfull 13d ago

These people aren't Patriots despite their attempts to define themselves as such. Lots of other words to describe them but not that one.

6

u/bcuap10 13d ago

You mean Nancy the unemployed lady claiming disability for diabetes isn’t more entitled to the fruits of the nation than a young PoC in grad school, because Nancy is hard working or would be if it wasn’t for her disability, and Nancy’s ancestors “built” this country?

4

u/nalydpsycho 13d ago

Like traitor, terrorist, insurrectionist...

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

82

u/failatlife1 13d ago

Just for people who don’t know who this is ?, he’s an actual nazi and holocaust denier

https://youtu.be/MozWPeWTx8Y

10

u/Broken_Petite 13d ago

.....I can’t. I just can’t.

→ More replies

11

u/VintageShotgun 13d ago

Just to think all he had to do was put on a mask and hed never be identified...

337

u/saiko1993 13d ago

I wish I had those shiny awards to give you which put a yellow glow on your comment. But I can't...so take an upvote from a poor old humble redditor

89

u/ezln_trooper 13d ago

The shiny stars are awards you can give? I thought they just showed up on highly upvoted comments randomly!

19

u/saiko1993 13d ago

I did too But apparently you have to buy them or something. I am not sure how one collects them

→ More replies

89

u/Lulu9342 13d ago

I got you homie!

48

u/saiko1993 13d ago

Fuckin-A

MVP

6

u/Tiger-Striped-nerd 13d ago

How do you do this?

4

u/saiko1993 13d ago

I have no clue bro!! Otheer peeps gave those stuff to my comment

→ More replies
→ More replies

29

u/Saint_Farewell 13d ago

"I wasn't going to hurt him, I just needed to start a war! Well, a bigger war. "

Varrick energy

9

u/GalacticLunarLion 13d ago

Ju Lee Melena do the thing!

8

u/JustABigDumbAnimal 13d ago

"If you're guilty of something, just accuse the other side of doing the same thing!"

"Like you did to me?"

"Yes! And look how great it worked!"

28

u/Intrinsically_Last 13d ago

This is Nick Fuentes... He wasn't banned because of Trump. He was banned because they figured out he was Nick Fuentes. Why do they act so surprised that when they take off their hoods people don't like them anymore than when they were wearing it?

14

u/baby-or-chihuahuas 13d ago

I wasn't sure who it was, so I Googled him and... Wow. Would not feel comfortable sharing a plane with him (even without the pandemic). Rather thankful he is on the no fly list.

→ More replies

34

u/t8rt0t_the_hamster 13d ago

iT's NoT fAiR /s

22

u/rredline 13d ago

“Who hasn’t tried to overturn a free and fair election ? I did nothing wrong!”

→ More replies

19

u/David-S-Pumpkins 13d ago

I didn't do anything wrong!

....K

→ More replies

295

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed]

58

u/Flaming_Eskimo 13d ago

Dude is also an out and proud fascist. Said on camera that he would march with Franco and Mussolini. Deserves every bit of this

→ More replies

88

u/halcyionic 13d ago

Also the kid that got scared out of BU by frat bros calling him out on his bullshit

65

u/a_dog_named_sandwich 13d ago

Literally went to school with this steaming prolapsed asshole. He demanded a debate from student government and it had to be shut down halfway because he was making literal fascist statements and there was almost a riot. Their fault for giving him a platform I guess

7

u/coalminer69er 12d ago

No no, everyone should be given a platform. Some people just need a platform with a noose overhead and a trap door under their feet.

→ More replies

9

u/sidBthegr8 13d ago

Who/what are groypers?

→ More replies

8

u/comefindme1231 13d ago

Went to high school with him, complete mind fuck that he is apparently known, thought he would’ve given it up but guess hate is strong!

658

u/Ben_Wah_Balls 13d ago

“Oh but don’t do that to ME”

-The GOP

123

u/myAFredditaccount 13d ago

You’re hurting the wrong people!

43

u/[deleted] 13d ago

I always feel the need to correct this quote because people actually make it appear more reasonable than it is. What she actually said was:

He’s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting.

It's a subtle difference. Conservatives don't care if they get hurt, they'll never say "you're hurting the wrong people", because they don't care if they're getting hurt as long as the people "who need to be hurt" are also being hurt.

17

u/ImTryinDammit 13d ago

Yup! Like crabs in a bucket. You can’t make them understand that a rising tide lifts all boats. I’ve tried explaining to them why a healthy and well educated society is good for everyone.. but this falls on deaf ears. A pros/cons check list totally baffles them. It’s like they literally (literal use of literally) seek to make sure that everyone suffers equally. And if someone has more suffering than most .. that’s ok. They spout on about their “charity” and deduct it on their taxes. But don’t you DARE try to come up with a way to alleviate suffering and they will set you on fire if you come up with some crazy way to *prevent” suffering and misery. You would think the anti abortion brigade would be very pro paid maternity leave, right? Wrong wrong wrong... they vehemently oppose it. Extend public schools to include child care and head-start education from 6 months and up? It helps mitigate child abuse and gives support to young families .. and eliminates the skyrocketing cost of daycare.. the investment would Pay for itself tenfold. Sounds great right? Nope! Make sure people are educated about sex and have access to birth control? Great! Negative!

Literally.. literally anything you propose to them that would prevent abortions.. they will strike down. Nope! Force that whore to have that kid.. and they can both die in the street during labor.. oh well. No one is getting out of the brutal consequences that they believe sex has to come with. Yes... we must make everyone suffer equally.. and it needs to include Extreme poverty and physical and psychological torture.

It’s really mind boggling. Scary ideology.

→ More replies

851

u/beerbellybegone 13d ago

Who knew that actions had consequences? Isn't that what the GOP is all about, personal responsibility?

349

u/63Spitfire 13d ago

No, you just don’t understand. He is a white man. He is supposed to be exempt from consequences It’s in the Constitution somewhere. Hold on while I look... ... ...........

161

u/paradox037 13d ago

Hold on while I look

No no no you're supposed to tell the other party to do their research, and point them to a relevant conspiracy theory Facebook group.

44

u/nada_accomplished 13d ago

Maybe provide a cleverly edited PragerU video to back it up, you know, like really smart, well-edumacated right wingers do

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

29

u/Malor 13d ago

Almost anytime you're dealing with conservatives and the law, this quote becomes immediately relevant:

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." -- Frank Wilhoit

The short form of that is 'laws for thee but not for me'. He's upset that he's facing the consequences of his actions; consequences aren't supposed to happen for white people.

Meanwhile, I'm sure he fervently supported the actual beatings being issued to BLM protestors.

22

u/gemini88mill 13d ago

GOP headliners don't like him either. I don't listen to him personally but calling the entire daily wire crew a Jewish slur isn't a good look.

11

u/caketruck 13d ago

you’re confused. What the GOP is all about is making other people be responsible for themselves. They want to cruise on other’s work while telling those same people off for being such softies and never knowing a hard days work.

→ More replies

735

u/Mr3Jays 13d ago

How about don’t support a domestic terrorist?

→ More replies

324

u/adam_lorenz927 13d ago

Republicans the last 50 years:

We love the free market!

*The free market turns against them*

Not like that! We like the free market that helps our biases and worldview!

70

u/ItsMEMusic 13d ago

Like seriously, you don't like the free market, you like preferential treatment.

That's it. It doesn't matter what system, you [they] want to have things others don't.

And I prefer equality, even to my detriment.

→ More replies

233

u/viviornit 13d ago

In that shitty persons defence they're not claiming to be censored, just refused service. The only part they got wrong was the part where they said they did nothing wrong.

80

u/seanpeery 13d ago

The response also wasn't about censorship. The response is saying that, via the wedding cake decision, it is okay for businesses to discriminate against clients requested services based on anything with their lifestyle they disagree with.

→ More replies

41

u/AngryZen_Ingress 13d ago

Hey it’s not like he’s a black woman sitting in the front of the bus or something!

→ More replies

143

u/Ivanwah 13d ago

When will you learn THAT YOUR ACTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES?!!!

48

u/kn312 13d ago

But but..he’s a proud white man

25

u/pissclamato 13d ago

Damned cancel culture. /s

→ More replies
→ More replies

451

u/Nunyabiz8107 13d ago

I support companies making life harder for nazis.

89

u/imakenosensetopeople 13d ago

Indeed. This is great advertising for those companies!

15

u/gvsteve 13d ago

I want this on a bumper sticker

→ More replies

11

u/SmootherPebble 13d ago

But they're gay!

/s

→ More replies

73

u/papacheapo 13d ago

Freedom of speech does not infer freedom from responsibility!

Say stupid things; get stupid prizes.

35

u/MultiFazed 13d ago

I hate to be "that guy" (okay, I don't hate it that much, clearly), but I think you mean "imply" instead of "infer".

Basically, imply/infer are related in roughly the same way that give/take are. A person implies something when speaking, and you infer it when listening.

5

u/Latraell 13d ago

Ooh I learned a thing. Please be “that guy” as often as you like.

→ More replies
→ More replies

36

u/FblthpLives 13d ago edited 13d ago

It's important to note that the "wedding cake case, CO" was ruled in favor of the bakery primarily because the Supreme Court judged that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission had not been neutral in its deliberations. The court found that the Commission had been hostile to the bakery owner's religious beliefes by comparing them to defending slavery or the Holocaust. The legal case itself addressed the balancing of two opposing rights: The protection against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation provided by the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act and the right of free exercise of religion provided by the First Amendment. Ultimately, the Court never ruled on this issue. The majority court opinion states that the court may have ruled in favor of the Commission if they had remained neutral in their handling of the case.

→ More replies

20

u/Dickey_Simpkins 13d ago

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but isn't the no-fly list maintained by the U.S. federal government?

24

u/Captain_Blackbird 13d ago

Kinda, the US Gov DOES have a no-fly list, but each airline company has their own as well.

Example: If the guy was an asshole to Delta, Delta can ban him from being on their planes - but this wouldn't affect other airline companies. Alternatively, the US no-fly list would affect all airliners.

→ More replies
→ More replies

26

u/F-Radiation 13d ago

Someone explain to me? Pls?

76

u/macodesmama 13d ago

Nick Fuentes is a Nazi. Like, a textbook JQ-believing, Holocaust-denying Nazi. And now he’s mad that private businesses are banning him and that the government is suspecting him of being a potential terrorist. The other person is referring to the case in which some cake-shop with a homophobic owner was allowed to discriminate against a gay couple and not bake them a wedding cake, and they’re implying that the same logic applies to other businesses and whether they want to serve Nazis or not. Allowing the first case and not the other would be morally inconsistent.

23

u/ansteve1 13d ago

gay couple and not bake them a wedding cake, and they’re implying that the same logic applies to other businesses and whether they want to serve Nazis or not.

Which is cute because they said "well would you want a Jewish baker to bake a NAZI cake?" and well here we are

9

u/veodied 13d ago

Republicans… morally inconsistent? Couldn’t be true…

→ More replies

89

u/Nico_k01 13d ago

Trump supporters stormed the capitol because they were mad trump lost the election

Guy who was at the "rally" was banned from stuff

Earlier there was a case about a wedding cakes place refusing gay weddings

Republicans are homophobic so they were eager to screw over gay people but claimed the cake shop could deny gay people because it is a private business meaning it can choose who it serves and who it doesn't

Now trump supporters are being denied by private businesses and they're throwing a fit over it even though this is what they wanted

→ More replies

6

u/SpookyDoomCrab42 13d ago

Nick Fuentes is a massive racist who advocates for violence against minorities and LGBT people. He's basically a 1940's style nazi that somehow gathered a large following in the US.

He's made threats in the past and funded some shitty organizations which is probably the real reason why he's banned from everything now. Sadly he's still got a pretty large following online

18

u/Taco4Wednesdays 13d ago

The cake is a bad comparison though, nobody referencing it seems to realize the actual details of the case and why it's entirely irrelevant here.

→ More replies

26

u/DandalusRoseshade 13d ago

Conservatives hate these 5 simple tricks the free market does when they see that Conservatism is falling out of favor-

4

u/InfiniteMugen_ 13d ago

Fuck that little Nazi bitch

→ More replies